<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bid chronicles &#187; Vista x64</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saga.bidyut.com/category/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saga.bidyut.com</link>
	<description>the nerd in me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:08:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft wants to kill itself</title>
		<link>http://saga.bidyut.com/presentations/gaming/microsoft-wants-to-kill-itself/</link>
		<comments>http://saga.bidyut.com/presentations/gaming/microsoft-wants-to-kill-itself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bidyut</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista x64]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/microsoft-wants-to-kill-itself/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is just my theory. Some people might have better ones, but seriously, it&#8217;s messed up. Microsoft have been going out of the way to get things moving for Vista. They didn&#8217;t want to slow approach that XP took for &#8230; <a href="http://saga.bidyut.com/presentations/gaming/microsoft-wants-to-kill-itself/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just my theory. <a href="http://www.sarcasticgamer.com/2007/06/my-operating-system-is-better-than-my.html" title="Sarcastic Gamer: My OS is better than My OS">Some people might have better ones</a>, but seriously, it&#8217;s messed up. Microsoft have been going out of the way to get things moving for Vista. They didn&#8217;t want to slow approach that XP took for people coming from 2000. Something that had nothing to do with the fact that Vista came 6 years after XP. But since Microsoft have to make the money out of it, first they got rid of all OEM XP at launch. Any freaking computer you get had Vista in it.</p>
<p>Granted Vista was  pretty, and is trying to be more secure. But just like the jump from 98 to 2000, all of a sudden a lot of things don&#8217;t work. A lot of applications need new patches or releases and a lot a lot of hardware needs new drivers. Heck, I&#8217;m still fighting to get my X-Fi to work with Vista. (Currently, just trying to install the driver Blue screens permanently). But hey, a lot of the things still do work.</p>
<p>Windows have always been known to be one of the most backward compatible operating systems. Lots of Applications written for 95 might still run today in Vista. Of course, none of the drivers will. Drivers for XP might work for Vista, but not recommended if they do work. Which makes me wonder why Microsoft did not just make it easy on them and just make Vista 64-bit. That would have definitely led to a faster adaptation. I mean the device companies need to write new drivers anyway. At least Apple is getting this right with Leopard, but Apple has their own set of issues.</p>
<p>Next up in DirectX 10. Microsoft decided that they are not going to bother having it ported to XP. Though they bothered with IE7 which will make your XP do all sorts of crazy stuff. Specially if you have the 64-bit edition. And then they released 2 new games only for Vista hoping that people will switch to Vista to play those games. I know they are crazy gamers out there, but most of them like to skin the money on a next gen hardware instead of an operating system. Not to mention that for getting the most out of those games you will need to have the latest mid-range anyway.</p>
<p>I seriously hope more warez groups out there bitch slap Microsof. May be then they will come into their senses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://saga.bidyut.com/presentations/gaming/microsoft-wants-to-kill-itself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A weekend with Vista x64</title>
		<link>http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/a-weekend-with-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/a-weekend-with-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bidyut</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vista x64]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/a-weekend-with-vista-x64/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First things first. I just have to mention how eye pleasing Vista is compared to XP. When I install XP, I either install the UXTheme patch or just go back to the classic view. However, in Vista the eye candy &#8230; <a href="http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/a-weekend-with-vista/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First things first. I just have to mention how eye pleasing Vista is compared to XP. When I install XP, I either install the UXTheme patch or just go back to the classic view. However, in Vista the eye candy is really nice and stays out of your way. That said, let me highlight some of my observations from this weekend. For the sake of not boring the non-techies, all the tenical stuff is after the jump.</p>
<p><span id="more-237"></span></p>
<p><strong>Application compatibility </strong></p>
<p>So far everything I have thrown at it worked. Granted that I have been prepared for Vista due to the times I have used it during the beta cycles. However, software that did not work even in RC2 worked fine. Besides, things actually working, there were cases where you actually get surprised from the information Vista provides you about the non-compatible programs. For example, GOM Player is apparently not compatible, however, when I told it to run anyway, I did not see any problems, not that I ran it too much anyway.</p>
<p>The more interesting one was Adobe Audition. For people who used Audtion, they know that Audition runs it&#8217;s own components or skinning engine. So when I ran Audition in Vista, Aero turned off automatically with a note saying that the software caused it to switch modes for compatibility. Once you quit Audition, it switches back to Aero.</p>
<p><strong>Enhanced security</strong></p>
<p>Security could a blessing or a pain. Like I always say, to have proper security to have to give up on something. Vista&#8217;s security meassures actually stops applications to change critical registry values when not running in previleged (a.k.a. &#8220;Administrator&#8221;) mode. Due to which file associations for Foobar would not work. But run it as Administrator and try setting it, wala! Same goes for initial settings for Audition. Which of course tells me that there are updates that I would just have to wait for before the complete switch.</p>
<p>Even installers are properly cared for. You know how some installers would start other installers in the back end. Unfortunately, those installers all get started off in non-previleged mode, which is something you may or may not like. However, once the background installer fails, Vista would ask you if you want to try that again in previleged mode, as it realizes that the installation failed. So no hunting down and figuring out which installers to run in previlegded mode.</p>
<p><strong>Video codecs</strong></p>
<p>Many of us already that the wide array of videos floating around in the net (not on video sharing sites like YouTube, etc.) are usually using the million different codecs. Due to which, one of the first things that I install in a new system is K-Lite Mega Codec Pack. However, I didn&#8217;t need to for Vista. The various files that I had saved thru my PVR all worked, which meant that Vista already supported XviD and DivX at the least.</p>
<p><strong>Aero, oh Aero! </strong></p>
<p>As I mentioned earlier,  Vista is just freaking cute. Specially when Aero is running. Flip3D, that many of you may or may not know about is just awesome. Sadly on slower systems like my laptop, you can feel the lag due to the animation, however, on my desktop things were rocking. The best thing is that all the windows are updating live when you are in Flip3D, so technically if you don&#8217;t have to interact with a window, you can keep switching between apps and check on their status. Even videos are running in that mode. The same goes for the small thumbnail when you put your mouse over the taskbar item.</p>
<p><strong>And finally the not so good things</strong></p>
<p>Not everything was high flying. Just like any other version revision there are bugs that have managed to slip thru. First thing I noticed was during installation when I switched the DVD with my driver DVD, the installer failed to realize that the DVD changed. Second, on my laptop when I sent it to hibernate when I was at work and resumed at home, the network failed to connect until I restarted. In fact, until the restart Vista did not even realize that we were now plugged in.</p>
<p>Not to mention that I have already seem the blue screen thrice in the period of 2 days. Though that&#8217;s a problem that might be caused by my X-Fi drivers (which are still in beta). It was great, however, that the drivers installed without much issue.</p>
<p><strong>Windows Vista is cute!</strong></p>
<p>In conclusion, I know I would be switching to Vista. Having the free copy seriously helps making that decision <img src='http://saga.bidyut.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  However, I would keep on using it on the laptop that does not see that many applications, until some new versions of drivers and applications are out. Or may be some Vista patches. After that I can deactivate my laptop and activate my desktop <img src='http://saga.bidyut.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/a-weekend-with-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>12 hrs with Vista</title>
		<link>http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/win32/12-hrs-with-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/win32/12-hrs-with-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bidyut</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vista x64]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Win32]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/win32/12-hrs-with-vista/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So far, everything is working on the laptop. Which is great, as laptop drivers are the harder ones to find There are two devices that didn&#8217;t find their drivers, but I haven&#8217;t figured out what they are. I think one &#8230; <a href="http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/win32/12-hrs-with-vista/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far, everything is working on the laptop. Which is great, as laptop drivers are the harder ones to find <img src='http://saga.bidyut.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  There are two devices that didn&#8217;t find their drivers, but I haven&#8217;t figured out what they are. I think one of them is the web cam and the other *shrugs* We&#8217;ll find out eventually.</p>
<p>Next. Vista x64 on the desktop, but that has to wait <img src='http://saga.bidyut.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/win32/12-hrs-with-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yay! My very own copy!</title>
		<link>http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/yay-my-very-own-copy/</link>
		<comments>http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/yay-my-very-own-copy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 06:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bidyut</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vista x64]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/yay-my-very-own-copy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#8217;t even expect this! First I get invited to the beta testing from a complete chance draw, and now this! I had a couple of bug reports, not that many really since work didn&#8217;t quite allow me to debug &#8230; <a href="http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/yay-my-very-own-copy/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t even expect this! First I get invited to the beta testing from a complete chance draw, and now this! I had a couple of bug reports, not that many really since work didn&#8217;t quite allow me to debug Vista to the fullest. And the stupid X-Fi drivers kept me away for a good bit. But now that the Vista is final, Microsoft is actually giving away feed back to all those beta testers who provided at least one bug report. And not just any Vista. It&#8217;s the Business or Ultimate edition!! Boo yeah! $500 value!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/yay-my-very-own-copy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft and their fugly skins</title>
		<link>http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/microsoft-and-their-fugly-skins/</link>
		<comments>http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/microsoft-and-their-fugly-skins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bidyut</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vista x64]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/microsoft-and-their-fugly-skins/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember that I said that Windows Vista is pretty? Yes it was. Just like Windows XP was before it became XP from Codename Whistler. I don&#39;t get why Microsoft does this always. Granted that it is not as ugly as &#8230; <a href="http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/microsoft-and-their-fugly-skins/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dragover="true">Remember that I said that Windows Vista is pretty? Yes it was. Just like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_XP" title="WikiPedia: Windows XP">Windows XP</a> was before it became <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_codenames#Windows_NT_family" title="WikiPedia: Microsoft Codenames">XP from Codename Whistler</a>. I don&#39;t get why Microsoft does this always. Granted that it is not as ugly as the every so popular blue Luna (yuk!), but still. Just look at it.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://saga.bidyut.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/07/vista-theme.png" title="New Windows Vista Basic theme" id="image208" alt="New Windows Vista Basic theme" /></p>
<p dragover="true">Look at what the basic used to look like and <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/windowsvista/archive/2006/07/06/440510.aspx" title="Windows Vista Team Blog: New Look">what it looks like now</a> (via <a href="http://www.longhornblogs.com/robert/archive/2006/07/05/16404.aspx" title="Longhorn Blogs: Robert McLaws">LonghornBlogs.com</a>). Apparently their reason for changing was that there is too much grey. Not to mention that Aero is only available to people with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_vista#Editions" aiotitle="WikiPedia: Windows Vista Editions">a version beyond Windows Vista Basic</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_vista#Graphics_hardware_requirements" dragover="true" title="WikiPedia: Windows Vista Graphis hardware requirements">with a good graphics card</a>. I guess they really wanted to move away from the grey as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OS_X" title="WikiPedia: Mac OS X">Mac OS X</a> is just so huge on it.</p>
<p dragover="true">On a better note, however, the new build 5472 is apparently faster and they finally fixed the problems with video playback. Some even say that it works better with the new nVidia drivers and that some games are actually running at reasonable speeds again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/microsoft-and-their-fugly-skins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The new kid in town 5456.5</title>
		<link>http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/the-new-kid-in-town-54565/</link>
		<comments>http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/the-new-kid-in-town-54565/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 04:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bidyut</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vista x64]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/the-new-kid-in-town-54565/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you lot may or may not know, the new Vista is out in the beta testing community, which I&#39;m gladly part of. For the last few builds I have actually been installing the builds in virtualized platforms and just &#8230; <a href="http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/the-new-kid-in-town-54565/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you lot may or may not know, the new <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_vista" title="Wikipedia: Windows Vista">Vista</a> is out in the beta testing community, which I&#39;m gladly part of. For the last few builds I have actually been installing the builds in virtualized platforms and just tackling thru the problems. However, when I toyed with this build, I realized that it&#39;s more proper. It&#39;s behaved.</p>
<p>Since it looked like it had some big jumps I started to read around about it. The one article that caught my eye was at <a href="http://www.longhornblogs.com/bleblanc/archive/2006/06/24/16373.aspx" title="LonghornBlogs.com: Vista build 5456">LonghornBlogs.com</a>. They mentioned how Build 5456 was not a direct decendent of Beta 2 that is publicly available. I have been personally using Build 5456 natively for the last 2 days. Granted most of those two days I was at work, but I did get to use quite a bit. It&#39;s better than Beta 2 people! We still have hope! Well for a Fall release that is <img src='http://saga.bidyut.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>What was amazing about this build was that due to my delay I could just use <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anydvd" title="Wikipedia: AnyDVD">AnyDVD</a> 2.0.6.2 beta which works with Vista. Also I use the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_Blaster_X-Fi" title="Wikipedia: SoundBlaster X-Fi">SoundBlaster X-Fi</a> beta drivers for XP x64; works like a charm! Now if only I could get 5.1 sound instead of Stereo. Not to mention that my <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avast%21" title="Wikipedia: avast! AntiVirus">Avast!</a> installed without a hitch and so did RemotelyAnywhere demo. However, I couldn&#39;t even get to the license page of RemotelyAnywhere, so that didn&#39;t really work. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_Acrobat" title="Wikipedia: Adobe Acrobat">Acrobat</a> installed without any problems and so did <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefox" title="Wikipedia: Firefox">Firefox</a>.</p>
<p>It&#39;s looking great! And it&#39;s sooooo pretty!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/the-new-kid-in-town-54565/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No security without breach of privacy</title>
		<link>http://saga.bidyut.com/rant-rave/hearty-blabbers/no-security-without-breach-of-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://saga.bidyut.com/rant-rave/hearty-blabbers/no-security-without-breach-of-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bidyut</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hearty blabbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista x64]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saga.bidyut.com/rant-rave/hearty-blabbers/no-security-without-breach-of-privacy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet another proof of this construct came about this week when the British government showed concerns over the improved security of the upcoming Windows Vista. Actually that should make people realize that Microsoft has finally given up and started listening &#8230; <a href="http://saga.bidyut.com/rant-rave/hearty-blabbers/no-security-without-breach-of-privacy/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another proof of this construct came about this week when the <a title="BBC: UK holds Microsoft security talks" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4713018.stm">British government showed concerns</a> over the improved security of the upcoming <a title="WP: Windows Vista" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_vista">Windows Vista</a>. Actually that should make people realize that Microsoft has finally given up and started listening to some of the long term concerns that have been a companion of all Windows versions.</p>
<p>When the codename Longhorn project started up, I had little faith in the changes coming to the next version of Windows. It was basically gonna be yet another upgrade to Windows 2000. On their roadmap back then they had the codename Backcomb project which included a rewritten kernel which I was more interested in. However, probably becuz of all the delays and such Backcomb got scrapped and Longhorn (now Vista) got an upgraded kernel.</p>
<p>I have to admit that there are some features in the new OS that I am already looking forward to. It reminds me of when I was beta testing Windows 2000. I was so psyched about it that I actually used the betas up until the actual release. Vista still has about 7 months, but as time goes forward, and stability settles in, I&#8217;d actually switch over when I&#8217;m all comfortable about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://saga.bidyut.com/rant-rave/hearty-blabbers/no-security-without-breach-of-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sound Blaster X-Fi and Vista x64 (5270)</title>
		<link>http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/sound-blaster-x-fi-and-vista-x64-5270/</link>
		<comments>http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/sound-blaster-x-fi-and-vista-x64-5270/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 15:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bidyut</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vista x64]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/sound-blaster-x-fi-and-vista-x64-5270/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I scrounged around the net to find anything about it becuz my initial driver installation was a disaster. Everything installed smoothly but the Sound Card refused to work after restart. After looking around back and forth and finally digging into &#8230; <a href="http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/sound-blaster-x-fi-and-vista-x64-5270/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I scrounged around the net to find anything about it becuz my initial driver installation was a disaster. Everything installed smoothly but the Sound Card refused to work after restart. After looking around back and forth and finally digging into the Microsoft beta newsgrounps, it seemed like that there were people who actually got it to work. So I started working at it again. Here are the steps that made it work:</p>
<ol>
<li>Use WinRAR to decompress the installer.</li>
<li>Try installing the driver thru Device Manager (in my case it failed).</li>
<li>Run the installer in elevated mode.</li>
<li>Restart and cross your fingers.</li>
</ol>
<p>That seemed to have worked. Now have I sound in Vista!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/sound-blaster-x-fi-and-vista-x64-5270/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Vista 64-bit</title>
		<link>http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/windows-vista-64-bit/</link>
		<comments>http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/windows-vista-64-bit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bidyut</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vista x64]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/167/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of weeks ago I got notified by Bink.nu that as their member I can apply for a evaluation for Windows Vista. I figured why the hell not. So I applied and, as usual, forgot all about it. Today &#8230; <a href="http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/windows-vista-64-bit/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of weeks ago I got notified by <a href="http://bink.nu/">Bink.nu</a> that as their member I can apply for a evaluation for Windows Vista. I figured why the hell not. So I applied and, as usual, forgot all about it. Today I was surprised by an email from Micro$oft asking me to accept or decline the request. So now I&#8217;m officially getting a copy of Windows Vista 64-bit on my system! It still has 10 hours to download (no thanx to slow DSL connections) but it&#8217;s gonna be there tomorrow. And then may be it won&#8217;t have all the horrific SATA problems that I heard Beta 1 had.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait to play around with it. The idea of a 3D accelerated Desktop is like looking at OS X <img src='http://saga.bidyut.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Update: <a title="Windows Vista Screenshots" href="http://saga.bidyut.com/pix/index.php?gallery=./Windows%20Vista">Screenshots</a> are up. Check them out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://saga.bidyut.com/geek-a-holic/vista-x64/windows-vista-64-bit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
