Having finished the Hitchhiker “trilogy” I can finally sit down and decide on which one I liked best. After quite a bit of thought, I have to go with the first book in the trilogy, thought I have to also admit that I really enjoyed the third book of the trilogy as well. The second and the fourth falls in the same category, but then you can’t really judge it like that.

The whole story of Hitchhiker is that there is no story, so do you think it’s fine for me to say that the story in the second that fourth was slower? Yes, I agree. I can’t/shouldn’t say that. But I can say that the frist and the fourth was definitely more packed with fun than the other two. Either way though, if people loved the movie, they would definitely love the book; that is if you love to read. Hint hint: The movie missed out some awesome parts of the book. Trust me.

There is a big chance they are going to do a second movie, by the way. where I stand I can’t see how they will do the fourth one of the trilogy without changing a good bit of the starting of the book. Well may be not a good bit but certainly some parts of it.

Since the book doesn’t really have a story per say, my take on favourite books are absolute bullcrap. Hence I end this note stating that my favourite character in the book was Marvin. Who’s yours?